Files
airflow/providers/common/ai/docs/observability.rst
T
Pierre Jeambrun be2829b917 Show which skills an agent was offered and used in the AI Model tab (#76309)
* Show which skills an agent was offered and used in the AI Model tab

When an agent behaves differently from one run to the next, the skills it
had and the ones it loaded are the first thing to check, and a skill pulled
from Git can change between runs without the Dag changing. Recording the
cloned commit next to each skill turns "it behaved differently yesterday"
into "the skill changed between these two commits".

* Keep skill calls made before an approval pause or a durable retry

A run resumed after a tool approval starts in a new process, and a durable retry
replays earlier tool calls without running them, so counting calls as they pass
through the toolset showed loaded skills as unused. Both get the earlier calls
back as message history, so the counts now come from there. A second skills
toolset on the same agent no longer replaces the first one's skills either.
2026-11-03 13:19:51 -05:00

297 lines
15 KiB
ReStructuredText

.. Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
distributed with this work for additional information
regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
"License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
.. http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
.. Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
software distributed under the License is distributed on an
"AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
specific language governing permissions and limitations
under the License.
Observability (OpenTelemetry tracing)
=====================================
.. note::
Experimental: the spans and their attributes can change in a minor release of this
provider.
See :ref:`howto/stability`.
pydantic-ai ships native OpenTelemetry instrumentation that emits GenAI spans
for each agent run, model call, and tool call, following the
`OpenTelemetry GenAI semantic conventions <https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/semconv/gen-ai/>`__.
When enabled, this provider turns that instrumentation on for every agent it
builds and routes the spans through the OpenTelemetry exporter Airflow already
uses, so they appear in whatever backend your deployment runs (Jaeger, Tempo,
Grafana, Phoenix, Langfuse, an OTLP collector, ...), correlated to the task that
produced them.
This covers all of the LLM operators (:class:`~airflow.providers.common.ai.operators.agent.AgentOperator`,
``@task.agent`` / ``@task.llm`` and the SQL / branch / file-analysis / schema-compare
operators), because they all build their agent through
:meth:`~airflow.providers.common.ai.hooks.pydantic_ai.PydanticAIHook.create_agent`.
How it works
------------
* **No extra infrastructure.** The provider does not configure an exporter or a
``TracerProvider`` of its own. It reuses the global provider that Airflow's
core tracing installs, so the spans share the exporter and endpoint already
configured under ``[traces]`` / the standard ``OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_*``
environment variables. If core tracing is not enabled in the worker process,
no GenAI spans are emitted.
* **Correlation.** The worker opens a task span before the operator runs, so the
agent's spans nest under it and share its ``trace_id``.
:class:`~airflow.providers.common.ai.operators.agent.AgentOperator`,
:class:`~airflow.providers.common.ai.operators.llm.LLMOperator` and its SQL / branch /
file-analysis / schema-compare subclasses (and their decorator forms) additionally stamp the
task-instance identity on every GenAI span they emit: the five keys core
tracing already puts on the task span (``airflow.dag_id``, ``airflow.task_id``, ``airflow.dag_run.run_id``,
``airflow.task_instance.try_number``, ``airflow.task_instance.map_index``) plus
``airflow.task_instance.id`` as the per-attempt run join key. So a span is
filterable by dag, task, run, attempt, or map index directly, without walking
up to the parent span (OpenTelemetry children inherit trace context, not
attributes).
An automatic retry reuses the task instance's persisted trace context, so all
attempts share one trace and appear as repeated task-run spans on it,
distinguished by ``try number``. Only a manual clear or rerun regenerates the
context and starts a new trace.
* **Run join key.** For an ``AgentOperator`` run or a run of ``LLMOperator`` or one of
its subclasses (and their decorator equivalents), the task-instance id
(unique per attempt, since Airflow regenerates it on each retry) is passed to
pydantic-ai as the run's ``run_id``. It surfaces on the run's GenAI spans as
``gen_ai.agent.call.id``, and the operator also exposes it, alongside the run's
token usage, on XCom under the ``run_id`` and ``usage`` keys. ``usage`` is
this attempt's own usage -- not the cross-attempt cumulative total described
under ``usage_limits`` in :ref:`howto/operator:agent` -- and it is pushed on
a failed attempt too, so a downstream ``all_done`` task or failure callback
can read what the last attempt spent. XCom is cleared at the start of every
attempt, so only the most recent attempt's value survives, not each
historical attempt's. A downstream task can then reference the
run (``ti.xcom_pull(task_ids="my_task", key="run_id")``) and a trace
backend can join a task's output to its agent trace without parsing logs.
``AgentOperator`` additionally: with ``durable=True``, steps an attempt replays
from the cache are not part of ``usage``; with ``enable_hitl_review`` the
``run_id`` and ``usage`` reflect the initial model run, not the human-feedback
regenerations; and a run that resumes after a tool approval (see
:doc:`tool_approval`) continues as ``<task-instance id>-resumed-<n>`` after
pause ``n``, which is the ``run_id`` the operator pushes, with ``usage``
covering every part.
Airflow 2 has no task-instance id, so there the key is
``<dag_id>/<run_id>/<task_id>/<map_index>/<try_number>``, and spans carry the five
identity keys without ``airflow.task_instance.id``.
* **Model name.** The model that actually answered is exposed on XCom under the
namespaced key ``__AIRFLOW__COMMON_AI_MODEL_NAME__``, separate from ``run_id`` /
``usage`` above, so a downstream task, a Jinja template, or a REST client can read which
model responded without parsing the decision record or a span
(``ti.xcom_pull(task_ids="my_agent", key="__AIRFLOW__COMMON_AI_MODEL_NAME__")``).
``AgentOperator`` and ``LLMOperator`` and its subclasses (and their decorator forms)
push it; like ``run_id`` and ``usage``, with ``enable_hitl_review`` it is the initial
run's model, not a human-feedback regeneration's, since ``regenerate_with_feedback``
doesn't re-push it.
* **Skills.** An ``AgentSkillsToolset`` publishes the skills it offered the agent, where
each came from (a local path, or a repository, path and commit) and the skill tools the
agent called for each, under the namespaced key ``__AIRFLOW__COMMON_AI_SKILLS__``. See
:ref:`agent-skills-observability`.
* **Scope.** The ``run_id`` / ``usage`` XComs and the model name come from
``AgentOperator`` and ``LLMOperator`` and its subclasses (and their decorator forms).
Those operators also stamp the ``airflow.*`` identity attributes on their spans, and so
does a Strands, ADK or OpenAI Agents SDK agent run inside ``agent_framework_tracing``
(see below).
* .. _howto/observability:model-tab:
**Model tab.** Separately from tracing, the provider adds an "AI Model" tab to the
task-instance page showing the resolved model name and the ``usage`` XCom above as a
readable table, including an estimated cost, and the skills XCom above as the list of
skills the agent was offered, with the ones it loaded first. It needs Airflow >= 3.4, since it relies on
the ``applies_to`` operator scoping core added in that version to show up only for
``AgentOperator`` runs and runs of ``LLMOperator`` and its SQL / branch / file-analysis /
schema-compare subclasses (and their decorator forms) -- the match is on the exact
operator name, so a subclass of your own does not get the tab automatically. Like the
span-level cost above, the tab's number is a best-effort ``genai-prices`` estimate, not
provider-reported billing. With a custom XCom backend that offloads large values to external storage (e.g. ``common.io`` with
``xcom_objectstorage_threshold`` set low), the tab reads the stored reference rather than
the real value, since the public XCom endpoint it calls never runs the backend's
``deserialize_value``: the model name badge would show the reference string (e.g. an
``s3://...`` path) instead of the model, and ``usage`` would come back as that same
string rather than an object -- the tab treats a non-object ``usage`` as absent and
hides the stat boxes instead of rendering ``undefined`` in each one.
* **Content is off by default.** Only token counts, model id, latency, tool
names, and finish reason are recorded. Prompt and completion text is never
emitted unless you opt in (see below).
* **Cost is already on the span.** pydantic-ai's own instrumentation sets a
best-effort ``operation.cost`` attribute on the model-call span whenever it
can price the response -- no provider configuration is needed for this.
.. note::
The agent-run span reports token usage under
``gen_ai.aggregated_usage.*`` while the per-model-call span keeps
``gen_ai.usage.*``. This avoids double-counting in backends that sum a
parent span and its children. Dashboards or alerts that read run-level token
usage from ``gen_ai.usage.*`` should switch to ``gen_ai.aggregated_usage.*``.
Enabling it
-----------
Enable core tracing and turn on the provider option:
.. code-block:: ini
[traces]
otel_on = True
[common.ai]
otel_export_enabled = True
Configure the exporter destination with the standard OpenTelemetry environment
variables, for example:
.. code-block:: bash
# Core tracing defaults the exporter to OTLP/gRPC. For an OTLP/HTTP
# endpoint (port 4318, ``/v1/traces`` path) also select the HTTP exporter:
export OTEL_TRACES_EXPORTER="otlp_proto_http"
export OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_TRACES_ENDPOINT="http://otel-collector:4318/v1/traces"
Capturing prompt and completion content
---------------------------------------
By default the spans carry no message text. To also record model inputs and
outputs (``gen_ai.input.messages`` / ``gen_ai.output.messages``), set:
.. code-block:: ini
[common.ai]
capture_content = True
.. warning::
With ``capture_content`` enabled, prompts, completions, and tool arguments are
exported to your tracing backend **without redaction**. Airflow's secret masking
applies to logs and rendered template fields, not to OpenTelemetry span
attributes, with two exceptions:
- What a function tool returns or raises while it runs in an agent this provider
builds, which is masked before the span records it. An output function's result
is not (see :doc:`agent_security`).
- The content ``AirflowTraceProcessor`` records for an OpenAI Agents SDK agent,
which passes through the masker first.
Enable it only for debugging in a trusted environment. It has no effect unless
``otel_export_enabled`` is ``True``.
Agents built with other frameworks
----------------------------------
.. note::
Experimental: ``agent_framework_tracing`` can change or be removed in a minor release
of this provider.
See :ref:`howto/stability`.
Strands Agents and Google ADK emit OpenTelemetry spans of their own. Run the agent inside
:func:`~airflow.providers.common.ai.tools.tracing.agent_framework_tracing` so those spans
follow the same rules as ``AgentOperator``'s:
.. code-block:: python
from airflow.providers.common.ai.tools.strands import AirflowTools
from airflow.providers.common.ai.tools.tracing import agent_framework_tracing
with agent_framework_tracing():
agent = Agent(model=model, plugins=[AirflowTools(warehouse)])
answer = agent(question)
Inside the block the framework leaves prompts, completions and tool arguments and results
out of its spans unless ``[common.ai] otel_export_enabled`` and ``capture_content`` are
both on, using the switch each
framework reads: the ``gen_ai_unredacted_attributes`` token of
``OTEL_SEMCONV_STABILITY_OPT_IN`` for Strands, and ``ADK_CAPTURE_MESSAGE_CONTENT_IN_SPANS``
and ``OTEL_INSTRUMENTATION_GENAI_CAPTURE_MESSAGE_CONTENT`` for ADK. A value your deployment
already set wins. Strands reads its switch once per process, when it creates its one tracer,
so create the first ``Agent`` of the task inside the block, not at module level; ADK reads
its switches when a ``TelemetryConfig`` is built, so build that inside the block too.
Every span started inside the block under the worker's tracer provider carries the same
``airflow.*`` identity attributes as ``AgentOperator``'s spans. When no tracer provider made
a span for the task, the Dag run's trace context is not made the parent of the framework's
spans: that context is marked as not sampled, and a parent-based sampler, the OpenTelemetry
default, would drop every span a tracer provider the framework installs starts. When core
tracing or auto-instrumentation made the task's span, the Dag run's sampling decision
holds.
The identity attributes go on spans of the tracer provider that is installed when the block
starts, so set up the framework's own telemetry, such as ``StrandsTelemetry``, before
entering it. They follow the task through ``asyncio``; ADK's synchronous ``Runner.run``
runs the agent on a thread of its own that they do not reach, so use ``run_async``.
The OpenAI Agents SDK traces runs with a system of its own, not OpenTelemetry. Register
:class:`~airflow.providers.common.ai.tools.openai_agents.AirflowTraceProcessor` with it,
and run the agent inside the block, to record its traces as spans under the task's span
with the same identity attributes and the same content rule:
.. code-block:: python
from agents import Runner, set_trace_processors
from airflow.providers.common.ai.tools.openai_agents import AirflowTraceProcessor
from airflow.providers.common.ai.tools.tracing import agent_framework_tracing
set_trace_processors([AirflowTraceProcessor()])
with agent_framework_tracing():
answer = Runner.run_sync(agent, question).final_output
``set_trace_processors`` also stops the SDK sending the traces to OpenAI, which it does by
default; use ``add_trace_processor`` to keep both. See :doc:`frameworks/openai_agents`.
Counting tool calls
-------------------
.. note::
Experimental: the ``common_ai.tool_calls`` metric and its tags can change or be
removed in a minor release of this provider.
See :ref:`howto/stability`.
Every call to one of this provider's connection-backed toolsets increments the
``common_ai.tool_calls`` counter through Airflow's metrics, whether the call comes from ``AgentOperator``, a
Pydantic AI agent you build yourself, or another framework through its adapter. It
answers which toolsets are used and from where without reading task logs. The counter
carries three tags:
.. list-table::
:header-rows: 1
:widths: 20 80
* - Tag
- Values
* - ``toolset``
- The toolset class, such as ``SQLToolset`` or ``ObjectStorageToolset``.
* - ``framework``
- ``pydantic_ai`` for ``AgentOperator`` and your own Pydantic AI agents;
``strands``, ``adk``, ``langchain``, ``anthropic``, ``openai_agents`` or ``claude_agent_sdk``
for a call through that framework's adapter;
``none`` for a call to a toolset's ``airflow_tools()`` made without an adapter.
* - ``outcome``
- ``executed`` when the call returned, ``failed`` when it raised (including a
failure the model is asked to correct), and ``replayed`` when
``AgentOperator(durable=True)`` served the result from its cache on a retry. A call
whose arguments fail validation never reaches the toolset and is not counted, and
neither is a call that pauses the run until a person approves it.
Tags never include arguments, connection IDs, table names or paths. They reach backends
that support them: OpenTelemetry metrics (``[metrics] otel_on``), or StatsD with
``[metrics] statsd_datadog_enabled`` or ``statsd_influxdb_enabled``. The Agent Skills
toolset, toolsets you write yourself and hand-built ``AirflowTool`` objects are not
counted.
See :doc:`configurations-ref` for the full list of options.